SanDisk desde su intento de dejar mal a los usuarios que tienen un iPod no es que sea muy de mi agrado esta marca, pero sigue siendo un competidor de Apple con futuro si sigue en la linea de estos reproductores. Tras los rumores hace meses de su Sansa e200 de 8GB por fin SanDisk anuncia el precio final y algo mucho mejor, ¡bajada de precios general!
Este de 8GB es el modelo e280 que costará alrededor de los $250, teniendo en cuenta que se puede expandir vía tarjetas SD no esta nada mal. Los otros modelos, el e250 de 2GB cuesta $140, el modelo e260 de 4GB ahora se recorta a $180 y el e270 de 6GB ahora cuesta $220.
Esperemos que Apple reaccione con nuevos iPod para este año.
(Vía iLounge)
oigan se me a perdido el disco de instalacion de mi sandisk e280 y y no puedo suvirle canciones kiero saver ke ago o si me pueden mandar el programa por correo.
y tamvien anterior mente me paso un accidente con mi sandisk e250 se trava al iniciarlo empiesa a actualizar base de datos y asi se keda asta ke se le acava la pila y tamvien se me extravio el disco de instalacion ya no c ke hacer con el e250 todavia sireve?
Rating Some time ago I purchased a Transcend 16 GB Class 10 card and rvwieeed it as Fast, Fast, Fast . Later reviewers pointed to the printed speed on the actual cards (and on the corporate web pages) (Transcend 20 MB/sec, Sandisk Extreme 30 MB/sec) as an indication that the Transcend card was not particularly fast. Since the term speed itself is pretty much a subjective description, and since the speed of the card also depends upon the speed of the camera hardware and software, I thought it might be worth speed timing the different cards in my camera (a Canon T1i). My original card, before I bought the Transcend 16 GB Class 10, was a Transcend 8 GB Class 6 (actually a micro-sdhc card) and my review of the Transcend Class 10 card was based on comparison with that card. I bought the Sandisk Extreme card (8 GB since it was pretty expensive) and tested each.The actual timing tests were simple enough. I formatted each card before each test. I then took 20 continuous photos at 8 MP, at 15 MP and at RAW, and recorded the time from the start of taking pictures to the time when the recording light turned off.Timing:1) Transcend 8 GB, class 6Format 51.5 seconds,20 continuous photos, 8 MP, least compression 8.6 seconds,20 continuous photos, 15 MP, least compression 13.4 seconds,20 continuous RAW photos 44.3 seconds2) Transcend 16 GB, class 10Format 46.2 seconds (the other cards are 8 GB so this time is not relevant. I included it for the sake of completeness),20 continuous photos, 8 MP, least compression 8.4 seconds,20 continuous photos, 15 MP, least compression 10.8 seconds,20 continuous RAW photos 31.4 seconds3) Sandisk Extreme 8 GB, class 10Format 8 seconds,20 continuous photos, 8 MP, least compression 8.0 seconds,20 continuous photos, 15 MP, least compression 9.7 seconds,20 continuous RAW photos 27.4 secondsResults:1) Clearly the Sandisk Extreme formats much faster than the Transcend Class 6. A comparison with the 16 GB Transcend Class 10 card would be invalid since the sizes are not the same and there is no evidence that timing for formatting is linear. That is, there is no reason to believe that it would take twice as long to format a 16 GB card as an 8 GB card. It might take more, it might take less,2) Taking photos at 8 MP, least compression, is nearly the same for all cards. Canon recommends a Class 6 card for the T1i and it appears that that is sufficient for photos taken at 8 MP,3) Taking photos at 15 MP, least compression, showed a significant difference depending on the card. The Transcend Class 10 card took almost 20% less time than the Transcend Class 6 card and the Sandisk Class 10 card took about 10% less time than the Transcend Class 10 card,4) Taking RAW photos also showed a significant difference depending on the card. The Transcend Class 10 card took about 29% less time than the Transcend Class 6 card and the Sandisk Class 10 card took almost 13% less time than the Transcend Class 10 card.Conclusions:Some things seem clear to me.1) The Transcend Class 10 card was clearly faster in all categories (except 8 MP) than the Transcend Class 6 and that was the basis for my review of the card. In my opinion the upgrade from the Transcend Class 6 to the Transcend Class 10 was worth doing given the way I take photos (15 MP, ocassionally RAW).2) The Sandisk Extreme Class 10 card is faster than the Transcend Class 10 card when used in the camera to take pictures larger than 8 MP (the difference at 8 MP is 5% which is not, in my opinion, significant). Clearly the difference between the Transcend Class 10 and the Sandisk Class 10 is significant although the user would have to determine if the 10% and 13% differences were worth the difference in price (the Sandisk 8 GB Class 10 is more expensive than the Transcend 16 GB Class 10). Given the way I use my camera I feel it is not worth the difference in price, but others may feel differently.3) The difference in speeds between the Transcend Class 10 and the Sandisk Extreme Class 10, when used in the camera, are very different than the theoretical differences given the posted speeds. Given those posted speeds, a user might well expect that the Sandisk Extreme would be about 30-35% faster, but it is not and one has to assume that the difference is caused by the speed of the camera hardware and software.I rated this card as 5 stars although the extra speed was not significant enough for me to justify the extra cost. Still, the card is faster than my Transcend Class 10.